# Williams and Frank Slam ‘Completely Wrong’ Penalty Call for Sunderland

> By  · Published 2026-09-13 · Updated 2026-09-13
> https://lesportifplus.com/en/2026/09/13/williams-and-frank-slam-completely-wrong-penalty-call-for-sunderland/

## Summary
Match of the Day pundits Ashley Williams and Thomas Frank criticised a penalty awarded to Sunderland after Ezri Konsa was penalised for fouling Dan Ballard, arguing the referee got the decision wrong and that a free kick should have gone to the opposing side instead.

## Key points
- Sunderland were awarded a penalty after Ezri Konsa was judged to have fouled Dan Ballard
- Pundits Ashley Williams and Thomas Frank both said the referee's decision was wrong
- Analysts argued the free kick should have been given to the opposing team instead

Match of the Day pundits Ashley Williams and Thomas Frank have criticised a [penalty decision](https://lesportifplus.com/tag/penalty-decision/) that went in Sunderland’s favour, arguing referees wrongly punished Ezri Konsa for a challenge on Dan Ballard. Both analysts said the officials got the call backwards, insisting the free kick should have gone the other way instead.

## What did the pundits say about the penalty?

Reviewing the incident on Match of the Day, Ashley Williams stated plainly that the referee was mistaken to point to the spot, describing the decision as entirely incorrect based on the replay evidence. Thomas Frank echoed that assessment, agreeing that the contact between Konsa and Ballard did not warrant a spot-kick for Sunderland.

> The referee was completely wrong to give that penalty, Williams said, adding that the free kick should have gone the other way.

## Why does the Konsa-Ballard incident matter?

The challenge between Konsa and Ballard became the flashpoint of the broadcast’s analysis because it directly influenced the match officials’ scoreline-altering call. Pundits argued that a closer look at the contact suggested Ballard, rather than Konsa, was the player initiating the foul, meaning the resulting free kick should have benefited the opposing side rather than Sunderland.

Such contested penalty calls routinely generate debate among fans and commentators, particularly when slow-motion replays appear to contradict the on-field decision. Williams and Frank’s shared verdict adds weight to growing scrutiny of how marginal contact is interpreted by referees during fast-moving passages of play.

## What happens next?

The penalty stood as given on the day, meaning the on-field decision was not overturned despite the pundits’ criticism after the match. The incident is likely to feature in wider discussions about refereeing consistency, though no formal action was reported regarding the specific call.

## Source

- [BBC Sport Football](https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/videos/cm2m7105d71o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss) — BBC Sport Football

## Sources
- [BBC Sport Football](https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/videos/cm2m7105d71o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss)